Product Design & Development
 Share
RSS Feed 

At Issue

Re-Shoring – Bringing Manufacturing Back To American Suppliers

 Permanent link

By Mike Collins, Author, Saving American Manufacturing

A new type of Trade Fair is coming to the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Irvine, CA on May 12, 2010. Mike Collins, Author, Saving American Manufacturing on Re-Sourcing

Sponsored by the National Tooling and Machining Association and the Precision Metals Association, the Re-Shoring Fair is all about bringing back work that has been outsourced to foreign competitors.

The 50 to 100 OEMs that are outsourcing machined components, stampings, special tooling, components and assemblies will meet American suppliers who want to bid on doing the work in the U.S.

So, why is re-shoring happening? Did President Obama negotiate a secret deal with the Chinese to reduce imports? Are omniscient customers anticipating the crash of the dollar? No, it is not that simple. 

Re-Shoring is the result of a whole host of nagging problems that U.S. customers have found out about the hard way. Here are some of the problems American companies have endured in recent years.

Deliveries & Customer Change Orders  

Jerry Hoopman of Amfor Electronics is a contract manufacturer in Oregon that builds a wide range of cable assemblies for other OEMs. Many of these assemblies are made in China, but Amfor has been having trouble guaranteeing their customers accurate delivery dates because of unforeseen delays in the supply chain.

Another problem is that Amfor’s customers want to make changes to their order during the manufacturing process, which is difficult because of communication problems and it causes delays in the manufacturing process.

In addition, Amfor found that after implementing Lean improvements, their costs of manufacturing in the U.S. are better than Chinese costs. Therefore, they are bringing the products back to manufacture in their Oregon plant.

Damaged Parts & Quality

Gregory Price is founder of Oregon Small Wind Energy Association and works with manufacturers of small wind energy systems. He says that many of these small companies have tried to reduce costs by sending parts to Asia. 

Many orders for key parts in the turbine are either damaged in shipment or do not pass the quality test when they are received. This causes problems for the manufacturer in terms of promised delivery dates and after service problems after the system is installed.

Rising Costs & Financial Terms

Four Northern California companies have reshored products from China to Wright Engineered Plastics. The CEO Barbara Roberts says, “Chinese manufacturers won’t ship until the product is completely paid for, and then transportation could add another 30 days or more. That’s a double whammy.”[1]

Inventory & Rising Costs

Vaniman Manufacturing, which makes dental equipment originally outsourced most of their sheet metal fabrication to China in 2002.

The original piece part production price quoted was 50 percent lower than U.S. prices, but as time went by the Chinese vendor required Vaniman to purchase in larger lots resulting in a larger inventory. The larger inventory then required more storage space.

These costs, in addition to the increasing costs of shipping and travelling overseas to visit the vendor, increased the total cost of ownership and ate up the 50 percent savings. Vaniman decided to bring their fabricated parts back to the U.S. to be manufactured by a local vendor.

Counterfeiting

Farouk Shami has built a $1 billion manufacturing company to make hair irons and other handheld appliances. He is moving all of his production from China back to Texas.

He cites loss of control over production and distribution as the primary reasons, but he also says, “the company spends $500,000 per month fighting counterfeits, most of which originate in China.”[2]

Farouk Systems has to track down the source and then bring legal action against them in China.

Customizing Products & Closer Proximity

NCR is bringing all of its production of ATM machines back to a facility in Columbus, GA.  The senior managers concluded that to really achieve innovation they had to be closer to their innovation center in Duluth — and closer to Universities and vendors.

Part of the reason is that they want to be able to customize some products and get to the market quickly. This simply could not be achieved with a supplier in China

Cost of Capital

Trevor Dunthorne, Vice President of Operations for All-Clad Metalcrafters in Canonsville, PA knows a lot about the long supply chains from Asia. All-Clad Metalcrafters manufactures very high-end cookware that Trevor says is the best cookware in the world. His claim must be true, because even during this recession the company cannot meet the cookware sales demand by working seven days a week.

While trying to find other sources of supply, the company decided to manufacture the lids (1.2 million) in China.

The Chinese supplier does a good job of manufacturing the lids. The quality is very high and within the standards of the other cookware.

But Trevor was concerned with the very long supply chain and the risks involved. He says, “If you can reduce the length of the supply chain, you can reduce the cost of capital. This frees up cash flow that can be used in the company on other projects.” All-Clad is bringing the manufacturing of the lids back to America — closer to the customers and closer to the main factory.

There are now dozens of different stories about the difficulties that American companies have discovered through the experience of outsourcing.  Space precludes describing more examples, but here is a list of some of the other problems:

  • Airfreight. If there is a problem in delivery, the supplier may have to airfreight the product, which is much higher than shipping costs.
  • Container costs go up and down with oil.
  • When parts are received with quality problems there is the cost of rework, returns and delays in delivery.
  • Just in time delivery of parts to an assembly line in the U.S. will always be problematic often for logistical problems beyond foreign manufacturing control.
  • Anticipating problems in the supply chain after the manufacturing shipment — because of trucking, customs, government agencies and shipping companies — is difficult to control.
  • Monitoring the vendor’s stability and internal problems is difficult unless you have a person onsite.
  • Asian manufacturers can make material substitutions without getting approvals — as happened recently in the toy/cadmium problem.
  • Foreign legal systems do not punish the offenders.
  • U.S. government does not help smaller manufacturers with counterfeiting problems.

The long and short of it is that many manufacturers have begun to pull their supply chains back closer to their markets. They have learned that problems beyond their (or anybody’s) control, like flu viruses, energy prices, earthquakes and geopolitical disturbances are threats to their supply chains.  They also now know the additional costs of all of the unanticipated problems listed above.

U.S. manufacturers have now experienced many of these problems and are more aware of the hidden costs and risks and are now in a better position to make realistic cost/benefit decisions on outsourcing. The tide is turning to manufacturing closer to the customer to reduce unanticipated risks.

It is time to take a new look at the benefits of outsourcing vs. re-shoring.

American manufacturers now outsourcing parts and U.S. suppliers, who are equipped to offer a locally manufactured high quality product, should consider attending the Re-Shoring Fair on May 12 in Irvine, CA.

For more information on Re-Shoring: Bringing Work Back to the U.S.A., visit www.NTMA.org. Mike Collins is the author of Saving American Manufacturing. His website is www.mpcmgt.com


[1] Some manufacturers find California chea-per than China, San Francisco Business Times, Ron Leuty, July 24,2009

[2] Coming Home: Appliance Maker Drops China to Produce in Texas, Timothy Appeal WSJ,, PAGE B1, 2009.


Hallelujah! Some American Manufacturers are finally getting it. I wish all manufacturers that are offshoring would not only close their China plants and move back home but destroy the specialized machinery in those China plants or bring it back home so that China cannot continue to build products once the manufacturer pulls out.
Posted by: waterman at 2/17/2010 12:57 PM


The solution to re-shoring is to have imports subsidize exports. Every dollar of exports earns a $1.20 coupon. Every dollar of imports requires a $1.00 coupon. The exporters sell the coupons to the importers. If trade is balanced the coupon price is very low. If imports exceed exports the coupon price goes up.

The system will work if America adpts it and even better if other counties adopt it.

The coupon system is self regulating, requiring no further government intervention. Big importers like WalMart, who have offices overseas, will promote US exports to gain the coupons they need to import.
Posted by: LA-Economist at 2/17/2010 2:48 PM


YES!...at last an idea revolutionary, In fact, I make the point that any centralized and rigidly controlled organization with top down thinking is a killer of creativity. I have years thinking in the same direction. Everyone in my family have that line of right-thinking brain, noone have a universitary degree with mathematical involve, all seems to have going with Graphic design, paintings, and inventions, cousins that are electric engineers don´t highlights imagination and are not creative. My son that is student of Graphic Design and never able with matematics, have a is an inexhaustible source of ideas and solutions in their work for the university, and teachers abusing their creativity on giving their professional work to him. Do not think that anyone thinks so, I know companies in Europe working the creative side with a very special, almost leaving employees free to Working at their own way and gives excellent results. The main point is not to "pressure" them to produce ideas but give them the freedom to think on them.
Thank you.
Posted by: abadiadelcampo at 2/19/2010 4:02 AM


In the 1970's and 1980's there were many tech startups in the San Jose area as there were many small shops that could each handle a part of the component and assembly requirements and minimum order quantities could be as small as 100 units - great for prototyping. To do that now it is far easier to contract with small factories in China as the consolidation of small manufactures into large conglomerates has killed a lot of small businesses, including fab and specialty machine shops. Small factories have a much easier time getting capital than their American counterparts due to government programs that are designed to help manufacturing instead of the banks and financial institutions as in the US. Lastly the actions of the IMF, WTO, and World Bank have been instrumental in devaluations of foreign currencies which makes it cheaper to buy and build from overseas than to use American workers. It is the disdain for the American worker as a key contributor along with capital to productivity that has greased the skids and a key anecdotal stories of production coming back to the USA is hardly reason to think that there has been a true reversal of the forces at work.
Posted by: ZeeBruce at 2/19/2010 3:59 PM


The real issue is profitability. As long as the biggest companies find it more profitable to make money with 'money' they will continue to relegate manufacturing to a commodity so that it can be bought in one country and sold in another country for less taxes than making the product themselves.

The tax rules could be as simple as this: Did you [yourself] manufacture tangible goods and sell them for a profit (above and beyond overhead)? If 'Yes' then your tax rate on these profits is X%. Did you make a profit on any product that you purchased from another company [and sold at a profit] or on any investments that you liquidated? Then your tax rate on these profits is Y%. Keep X lower than Y to a point where it is more profitable to make a 'part' than it is to make a 'financial' investment and the big companies will bring back manufacturing. Right now it's to easy to outsource the work and sell product they didn't make at a profit and not pay taxes on it. It use to be that way in the 60's - 80's. Then the bankers got in on the act...
Posted by: Fingers at 2/22/2010 1:33 PM


With more and more people seeing this on Wal*Mart's China web page under "About US"..

"Wal-Mart China persists in local procurement which provides more job opportunities, supports local manufacture industry and promotes local economy. So far, 95% of merchandising sold at Wal-Mart China store are local products by which Wal-Mart has established business relations with nearly 20,000 suppliers. At Wal-Mart, we treat suppliers as partners and would like to develop with them. In 2008 Wal-Mart won the Supplier Satisfaction published by Business Information of Shanghai for five consecutive years."

which doesn't support American export and American jobs....

and reading...

Remember what Lance Winslow wrote in tat article "The Flow of Trade in a Global Economy"....dang! better yet...jus take the time and read tis ...."Now let us look at Wal-Mart again; you buy a product there, 6% goes to the employees, 10-18% is profit to the company, 25% goes to other costs and 50% goes to re-stock or the cost of goods sold. Of the 50% about 20-25% goes to China, a guess, but you get the point. Now then, how long will it take at 433 Billion dollars at year for China to have all of our money, leaving no money flow for us to circulate? At a 17 Trillion dollar economy less than 40-years minus the 1/6 they buy from us. Some say that if we keep putting money into our economy, it would take forever, but if we do not then eventually all the money flow will go. If China buys our debt then eventually they own us, no need to worry about a war, they are buying America, due in part to our own mismanaged trade, so whose fault is that? Not necessarily China, as they are doing what's in the best interests, and we should make sure that trade is not only free, but fair too."

Also, think for a moment about George Washington....yes the man tat is on the US dollar bill.... "Washington had been reelected unanimously in 1792. His decision not to seek a third term established a tradition that is now embedded in the 22d Amendment of the Constitution.

Take the time to read his farewell address after only eight years of serving his country and than ask yourself tis....How do you think George feels being sent overseas in return for all tat foreign so-call cheap items and being left in a foreign bank because the American worker doesn't make anythig for the foreigners to buy. Cheap items didn't make tis great union of 57...oops! 50 states the greatest place on the face of tis Earth.....the American worker (union and non-union) did.

You can't have a strong country without having a strong currency and you can't have a strong currency unless you keep it floating around within your 50 states. Tis is why the store with the star in the name puts 95% China made items in their stores in China....to keep their "yuan" in their country helping the nice people there. And with only 5% left for all the other 182 country's tat make stuff including the United States of America....tat doesn't produce very many jobs outside of China.

Being an old person myself and knowing how it wus back in the 40's, 50's and 60's in tis union of 50 states....I look at George each time I pull him out of my billfold and make a promise to send him out for items made in America so after floating around helping each hand he touches jus maybe one day he will shake mine again.

Which when one adds...

15 cargo ships pollute as much as 760 million automobiles...yes....760 million.

and it takes $9 billion in hidden taxes from all Americans to clean fish from ballast tanks of ships each year...

People need to realize...RETAIL makes nothing!
and until America gets back on tat track tat George Washington left it in 1796....he will not every get back home to the states if people keep sending him(dollar bill)to foreign lands for so-call cheap items....cheap ain't chic!

Wake up America!
Posted by: madmilker at 3/12/2010 3:26 PM


register or log in to comment on this blog!

At Issue

Silicon Valley’s Low Down, Dirty Shame
David Mantey, Editor, PD&D
Entrepreneurially Hard Wired
Mike Rainone, Co-Founder, PCDworks
Always Connected
David Mantey, Editor, PD&D

Site Sponsors


Most Viewed

Videos & Webcasts

Social Media in Product Design 2/3/2012
In this episode Vince and Allison focus on tools to help an internal design team collaborate, from Social Media to Top Down Design to Skeleton models.     Continue
FIRST Robotics Competition Game Animation 2/2/2012
The FIRST Robotics Competition build process is underway. This animation presents the 2012 FRC game and rules.     Continue
Full Scale Lego Ballbot 2/2/2012
A Large Scale Lego Ballbot was constructed by 3 senior students at KU KPS, using a Lego NXT Mindstorms kit and other available Lego parts   Continue

Top Stories and Headlines
EVERY DAY!

FREE Email Newsletter