Product Design & Development
 Share
RSS Feed 

At Issue

Full of Sound and Fury

 Permanent link

by Anna Wells, Executive Editor, IMPO

Anna WellsAs someone who spent the better part of college studying modern literary theory — a vocation so rich with complexity yet sparse in practical application — I can sympathize with the other liberal arts devotees out there: the ones with the music performance or art history degrees. Perhaps when I have a child in college and I am footing the bill, my understanding will lessen… but I hope not. For the sake of erudition (and the ability to use words like erudition in a sentence), I don’t regret the essays on Death in Venice, or the day I read The Sound & The Fury in UW-Madison’s Memorial Library stacks.

Still, perhaps if I were selecting my college classes today, I’d have something a little more practical in mind, especially after the Great Recession taught us that good jobs don’t hide waiting for us in a Trojan horse somewhere… not like they used to anyway.

Time.com recently released its list of the current 10 most lucrative college majors, along with the 10 least. As manufacturing engineers, would it surprise you to know that 8 of the 10 titles end with “engineering”? Here are the top ten, relative to earnings level:

  • Mining and Mineral Engineering
  • Metallurgical Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Mathematics and Computer Sciences
  • Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Administration
  • Petroleum Engineering

This list came as an interesting follow-up to an article I read on CNN last week that highlighted a growing problem where undergraduates across the country are choosing to leave science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) programs before they graduate with those degrees. Many students in those STEM fields struggle to complete their degrees in four years, or drop out, according to a 2010 University of California, Los Angeles, study. In fact, nearly 22 percent dropped out after five years.

According to the CNN article, James Brown, executive director of the STEM Education Coalition, said a big problem is that educators don’t often realize the urgency of fostering the next generation of American scientists and engineers: “Universities and faculty have to understand this is a national priority,” Brown said.

One of the reasons these programs have such a high failure rate is relatively straightforward: the course work is hard. But as a matter of national priority, we should be careful about how much failure we perpetuate. While nobody wants an un- or under-qualified electrical engineer, there’s something to be said about a little support to help these kids flourish.

As it becomes more evident that highly-trained workers are the sticking point for America’s ability to thrive in some of these competitive global fields, it’s up to us to do whatever we can to encourage some of them to hop off the corporate ladder and take a stab at careers in automation and design. Think of all of the would-be STEM leaders of today who migrated to business school when high finance was the place to be. Now, it seems the tables have turned. And at this point, it is we who should be full of sound and fury over the fact that these jobs are funneling overseas partly due to a public education system that undervalues these types of skills.

I’m certainly not telling you to yank your daughters and sons out of their dance programs and debate clubs. But as business leaders, perhaps you could consider ways in which you can lead the charge. Open up your business for tours and career days, mentor teenagers (show them the list!), or donate some money to keep your local high school shop program in place.

There’s nothing wrong with spending your college years honing your skills in the area of your choosing, but parsing a novella by Robbe-Grillet is not going to get you on that top ten list, most likely. STEM rules the day, and we’d better get behind it before our competitive opportunity gets re-shelved and forgotten like so many stacks of vintage books, waiting to be read.

What are your thoughts? Post your comments below or send them to anna.wells@advantagemedia.com.


The engineer working for a corporation has very little job security. The plant closes, or moves overseas, and the job is gone. There is more security and money to be made in Law or with an MBA than in engineering. Have seen way too many high priced unemployed engineers. If the country wants engineers, it needs to provide jobs for them.
Posted by: dick494 at 6/7/2011 2:05 PM


I struggled to get my engineering degree in 5 years, 20 years ago. That phenomenon hasn't changed. It's more expensive now, relatively speaking, which is probably a factor.

I was speaking with a recruiter on the same topic recently and she explained that technical experts are not especially unemployed right now, and placement is made very difficult because hiring managers are seeking very specific skill sets and experience for their open positions. It makes finding suitable matches very challenging. Perhaps this is one behavior we can begin to influence to make the career field more attractive.

Also, persuading genX and genY engineers to relocate is more difficult than it has been with ambitious baby boomers. I wonder if smaller design centers in desirable locations will be more common in the near future. Major engineering industry centers such as Detroit (automotive) just aren't as glamourous as they used to be for prospective engineers who are wondering where their degree will take them. Perhaps they are dreading that they will end up in China.

I fear that apparent decline in engineering based industries in the U.S., and the fact that what industry remains is often in locations a new graduate would not desire, may be making the prospects seem not worth the effort of finishing.
Posted by: Alan Nicol at 6/8/2011 1:14 PM


register or log in to comment on this blog!

At Issue

Picking Glass Out of My Eyes
David Mantey, Editor, PD&D
Asteroid Mines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Karl Stephan, Consulting Engineer, Texas State University, San Marcos

Site Sponsors


Most Viewed

Videos & Webcasts

David Eagleman: Welcome to Your Future Brain 5/22/2012
We're entering a very interesting stage of human history right now where we can start importing technology to enhance our natural senses or perception of the world, says neuroscientist David Eagleman.     Continue
Race on Sunday, Sell on Monday 5/21/2012
Allison and Vince explore how Aston Martin Racing takes lessons from the race track to inform their consumer car designs.     Continue
Jaron Lanier: Why Facebook Isn't Free 5/21/2012
Internet pioneer Jaron Lanier argues that free technologies like Facebook come with a hidden and heavy cost - the livelihoods of their consumers.     Continue

Top Stories and Headlines
EVERY DAY!

FREE Email Newsletter